Monday, April 28, 2014



Apple regains momentum as Windows stutters






AAPL surges for a second time after announcing stock split

These aren't individual investors these are big funds and institutional investors who made money selling

Now they'll make money buying AAPL before the split


From Friday's close: A good sign that the large funds are coming back into AAPL ahead of the split

AAPL did not sell-off with the rest of the Techs on Friday



Apple has at least twice as many credit cards on file as Amazon





40% of Chinese consumers turn to phablets as Apple said to prep jumbo iPhone






iPhone 5c ate up Android while Google's Moto X flopped: why everyone was wrong

69 percent of iPhone 5c buyers were new to iPhone, while 60 percent had switched from an Android phone





This is a lot more thought-out than Phillip Elmer Dewitt's explanation that $100 was a nice round number.

The explanation below reconciles with what Tim Cook said about giving the young individual investor a chance to participate.

It's those huge fund traders who get to buy and sell before the market opens and after it closes that really suck.

Finally, an explanation for the Apple stock split that makes sense


...The protection we all get as investors, those guarantees that our orders will be handled at best market price and so on, only apply if we're dealing in standard lot sizes. Which means, in effect, 100 shares or more in any one transaction. And 100 shares in Apple at $500 each or more isn't something that the average individual investor is going to do. Whereas 100 Apple at $80 is still a weighty purchase for an individual but one that's going to have rather more people willing to consider it.






Apple's newfound glory






iPads and tablet growth




Apple's $44 billion in stock buybacks have helped increase market cap by $100 billion






When Apple's Tim Cook didn't like stock splits

Apple is doing something Tim Cook once said "does nothing."





The Astonishing, "Disappointing" iPad

MG Siegler:

iPad sales did disappoint one group of folks immensely: Wall Street. As a standalone business, just based on the last 12 months of revenue, the iPad would be in the top 100 companies in the Fortune 500. Think about that for a second. The iPad alone is bigger than almost all Fortune 500 companies.

If the iPad is a fad, it's the greatest fad in the history of American business.

It's easy to point to "fewer iPads sold" and Chicken Little the story to death – as respected columnist Gassee and Mossberg have done. But it would still be wrong.





MacBook Pro and MacBook Air help Apple to gain PC market share





Why Enterprise Apps Are So Important to Apple's Strategy





Grand tour of the Apple retail palaces of Europe: London






Archetype of capitalism in ex-communist party Barcelona HQ building




Where Angela Ahrendts fits in, high-end retail and fashion.

This Is What Apple Will Build When It Finally Collects 1 Billion Credit Card Numbers





Apple wins temporary reprieve in e-books damages trial as U.S. appeals court to consider stay






Appeals court rules Apple can sue Motorola, creates claim chaos for Data Detectors








Apple is placing huge bets on itself in more ways than one

Apple, Inc. spent $18B to buy back 31.7 million shares of AAPL in March quarter






Southeast Asia may be Apple's next growth driver as sales soar in Vietnam






Microsoft Word app for iPad flops with users after 500 one-star reviews






Florian Mueller has made a complete 180 degree about face to the dark side.

I can only assume that Google, Samsung or both are paying him to retract all of his earlier research supporting Apple's patent battles and now write opinions and propaganda to the contrary in their favor.

Very sad and pathetic 

Google should further appeal the Apple-Motorola case: Federal Circuit panel was divided. 

Copying is all that Samsung needs to do to work around four of Apple's five patents...








No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.