Tuesday, March 1, 2016






NY Federal Judge rules US can't force Apple to unlock iPhone in drug case cites "unreasonable burden"







Here's why the FBI went after Apple when it did






The US has gone F&%ing Mad







Husband of San Bernardino survivor says shooter's iPhone unlikely to contain valuable information, wife also issued iPhone...






Politics makes strange bedfellows

GOP congressman: I'm more in Apple camp versus FBI






She and her predecessor, Eric Holder, have been very anti-Apple

Attorney General Lynch Scheduled to Speak to Silicon Valley Execs Today on the Problem of Evidence 'Going Dark'







Something is screwy with the Obama administration's Justice department.

First there was the iBooks case, where the Attorney general's minions protected a monopolist, Amazon, vs a new entrant to the eBooks market, Apple, even calling "Apple the monopolist."
 
The Justice Department also threatened book publishers, who then backed-out of making book deals with Apple in favor of Amazon.

They, Holder and Lynch, can't pretend to be upholding the law, while breaking the law.

Judicial panel members consider legal brief in Apple case: sources







US House members mull court filing arguing Congress should decide Apple-FBI encryption fight







On Tuesday, Apple will Face one of the Biggest Corporate Challenges in its History





Building unlock tool for FBI could create dangerous international precedent, says Apple lawyer






What will credit card companies do if the US forces a security breach in the iPhone?

MasterCard to roll out Apple Pay support in Canada, Brazil and Asia in 2016, report says






Yeah, right

EU competition chief denies anti-US bias in investigating tax deals like Apple's






Purported MasterCard roadmap indicates Apple Pay coming to Brazil, Japan, Hong Kong & more this year






How did an experienced team of bankers and lawyers botch the $5.8 billion Sharp-Foxconn deal?






No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.